We tend to wind up on the same email chains, and this latest was asking our opinions on biodesiel as an alt-fuel.
I said:
Read the article on algae, but let me propose this: we're talking about burning old carbon (oil) versus new carbon (the alt-fuels). Now earth pumps out something like 44 terrawats in heat energy, the sun an effective D-Cell battery, and pebble nuclear reactors are a good alternative for powering cities, etc. We need efficient ways to harness and store this energy (gimme some room temprature superconductors!!). We mandate ethanol/bio desiel we're just going to substitute big oil (dug up from dangerous sands) to big corn (dug out of peoples mouths).
And he responds:
I prefer all-electric over biofuels. In terms of generating the electricity - I prefer nuclear for the time being while pushing for better efficiencies & methods in production/consumption.
Looks like nukes are a winner.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c461/0c46106a78c1cbca6b12afd901591b8b2cb216be" alt=""
I'll let you decide on Biel v. Beckinsale.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f64d/4f64d9411cb4ad8d31af7d4e495ebe85c4a7fca7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37b0b/37b0b118963d9c11c8d1e1b33877c7c80ab6a467" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment